What to do Review Essay Example

What to do? Review Paper Essay on What to do? Cyril, you think that the review should cover the topic of rational egoism, complementing the novel? I do not think its appropriate. For those who have not read it its just another reason to show curiosity. As for the ideals of reasonable selfish in my opinion, everything is just in its place. Of your opposition is very clear ideological pattern, you practice with fervor. But thats a true story you do not seem to know. You forgot, for example, that the People take the nearest to Chernyshevsky generation of Democratic Youth were initially for the most peaceful way of development: hoping that the tsarist government, without waiting for the uprising, dare to go to the most extensive concessions to the people the rebellion would be superfluous and so much the better: then will gather forces to peaceful work. And what happened? Tornado government repression against peaceful advocates 1874-1878 gg. (Up to 8 thousand arrested only in 1874.), Dozens of political trials of those years wit h sentences of 10-15 years of hard labor for the printed and spoken word, and finally only 16 executions in 1879 for unproven belonging to a criminal association For the 1879-1882 biennium. 30 were executed revolutionaries. If the enforcement of sentences applied sadistic methods. What cost, for example, the royal grace when sentenced to death closed hooded and so kept the gallows (NA Ishutin) or try on a neck loop (SA Leshern), and then declared a pardon? Even hanged for being found during a search of a proclamation of Narodnaya Volya, or for belonging to a revolutionary organization. (Troitsky NA Madness of the brave. M. 1978, pp. 113,123,154,197,195). As a result, the tsarist government has provoked a wave of retaliatory actions that were morally justified by the then Russian society. Against these bloodthirsty animals need to be protected as soon as possible, with the help of gunpowder and bullets, because Russia is the only means by which a clever, brave and self-respecting people for protection against agents incredibly oppressive regime, rightly notes in this regard Engels. Moreover, unlike you, Cyril, the new people of that time Narodnaya Volya sympathetic and very FM Dostoevsky: acquittal Zassulich applauded those present in the courtroom State Chancellor of the Russian Empire, His Serene Highness Prince Alexander Gorchakov and Fyodor Dostoevsky. (Highly recommend reading a short article historian Nikolai Troitsky What I love the People And then. Chernyshevsky did not write about the dreams of new people, and their practice, usability in everything, is presented as a man of calculation, despises slavery in all its forms, not willing to put up with them in anything As for the popularity of the novel, secured Lenin Reviews (goodness would still soviet propaganda!) -. and here you are also very wrong Just remember, for example, is a polemical poem VS Kurochkin (written in 1863.year): No, positively, the novel What to do is not good do not know th e author or Gypsies, neither maidens dancing the cancan, Alice and Rigolbosh No, positively, the novel What to do? is not good (see the whole here) More!.!. more wildly listening, when executions KGB accused of new people a la Rakhmetov explaining their demons of Dostoevskys story again resting, but, obviously, ideology prevails, first shovels -. in the soviet times, then neoliberal, and now the Orthodox -hristianskaya. By the way, most disliked the novel is the representatives of this particular ideological cohorts. Why? Tchernyshevskiy because it is a person is declared the measure of all things rather than the so-called higher spiritual forces What to do Review Essay Example What to do? Review Paper Essay on What to do? The correctness of conducting polemics NA unlimited, and it is clear, the teacher called, thank you for it in the first place:.) The answer is not it, because do not see sense, respond to others who chance here looked As one of the teachers of our NA Ulyanov wrote there, who considered himself to be the new man? Kant idealistic bastard, and the more we are priests rassteralyaem, the better. So it seems like nothing is distorted. though on pamyti quoted. I was accused of ideological template and immediately pulled rashozhie inventions from Soviet history books: the accusations of brutality tsarskogomu regime. This is just the height of cynicism lead figures of the victims of the tsarist regime, dropping millions of tortured people new people. It is the height of cynicism to compare the cruelty of the brutal tsarist with the affairs of the regime, which is obtained by the subsequent human activity those for whom the ideal of man was Rakhmetov. When justified Zasulich, that is, the woman retained as a result of the trial life (estimate, perhaps there was such at the courts, which then established those who hav e been brought up on Rakhmetova), but it is supported by Dostoevsky, I wonder whether it is possible to imagine Dostoevsky which would have applauded the death sentence? Cited as evidence of the poems Kurochkin is also of a very cheerful :)))) Kurochkin is a strong argument. Poet agitation, poet a leaflet, the poet a daily newspaper, a poet, who considered himself one of the new people and always write only about We will write a custom essay sample on What to do? Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on What to do? Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on What to do? Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Now about Lenins famous drop pathetic nonsense neo-Kantians, positivists, Machians. and other muddled  ». As shown by the subsequent development of science, it is the neo-Kantianism and positivism became the methodological basis, from which grew the modern science, including the theory of relativity and quantum physics, modern mathematical methods. We should not forget that all they Kantians and positivists were also brilliant scientists in specific areas of science. The largest representatives of positivism and neo were outstanding matemitiki, physics and lingivisty and beyond. One name Bertrand Russell speaks for itself. And if it were not for the very neo-Kantian, it would never have been and Husserl. Broken in the dust down and Lenin and Max and Avenauris remained in the history of science as outstanding scientists, not just empiriokritsitisty only to Lenin, they proved to be miserable Berkeleians. The very same Lenin with his famous mother defined above which would be happy to laugh Marx who gladly applauded the same Berkeley, he remained in the history of philosophy as best as naà ƒ ¯ve, but rather aggressive misunderstanding which has issued over the past achievements of philosophy sensationalism of Locke, of course Without realizing it, and not refleksiruya. and again about the new people, if you want to understand what it was for effect, then, of course, be read Chernyshevsky as a new man writes about the new but should be read in additional olnenie to this though and Turgenevs Fathers and Sons, Goncharova and Open, and Dostoevskys The Possessed, and Sologub Little Demon, and Nabokovs The Gift. So, when the question arose, how much can the victims bring in response to the atrocities of tsarism and for the future (note how many you can kill measures of all things for the sake of a bright future), they replied simply: as long as the resistance will not stop, and began just cut out all who are not with them. So do not be confused starry intentions with actual practice, starry intention is the scope of just that same Spirit, abstract and tea or from the rostrum, but the interruption of the flow of common but unique and unrepeatable life is the very real practice. And in practice, which accomplishes a particular person there is always a mo tive. So thats it about their motives always forget to abstract theorists, but the specific practice of bright future, or rather, they give it the same desire bright future for all of your motive, calling it a rational egoism or even some nonsense. So unlike them real deep writers, what were Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Goncharov, Chekhov and other Russian classics, did not trust this abstract motives and showed specific motives and true. And when they did, there is a quite different view of the new people. That is why the novels Broken and Demons did not find understanding and acceptance of his contemporaries, in fact, on the one hand, there were those convinced of their holiness new people, and on the other the same dull gendarmes, who had their own specific motives . This sign of the prophet in Russia is not spitting and cursing, and complete isolation and unnoticed. Until now, the most unread novels of Russian classical literature are Open and demons in the twentieth century, it added more and The Gift. That broadcast is still their starry ideals of the new people, already broadcast on the Internet, rather than simply refer to the unit of conscience. To his personal conscience, which is within each of us. And while not address every one of us is to it, and not to any dogma that the new that the Christian, or even how, there will always be obtained, for the sake of ideas can be sent to anyone and viselnitsy indefinitely. All. (last paragraph was part of my argument about the novel Constantine Makar Private history since the first of the Presidents, which I still just can not write a review). Dear Cha, you can not bother to not answer me, because after elementary rudeness, which I ran here to chat with you does not intend to. All the best. What to do Review Essay Example What to do? Review Paper Essay on What to do? Yeah, the show goes can not keep silent and useless to argue with this reasoning. About Semyonov your efforts are in vain, assume that everything is fine, I know, almost all read! You just have to poke a finger specifically where? 1) it was executed by various sources, about 10 thousand people again, take the number? Oh, not in Dostoevsky as a tear and do not miss one. And Im sorry, but you do it in view of January 9 (5-15 thousand. Killed), Lena shooting (? Th.), Etc. if so, does not go vosche starry underestimated. 2) starry-eyed, having under a most ordinary motives, but cloaked a desire to build a paradise on earth and on this basis, covering the question of normal justice leads to consequences even more terrible and despotic than any other form of ideology. superficial glance he still does not explain anything: but where does such a powerful idealism, why is it so deftly moves masses of people wanting to paradise? All this remains the ideological mysticism to dupe, whic h can only believe. Meanwhile, it is clear that this ideological illusion ( socialism and communism, equality, brotherhood, etc.) are driven by the masses, and the case then, of course, not in the names of these illusions, and their origin in fact that for them the most selfish interests above all manor. Who remembers, as a joke: furniture, away By the way, noticed Karsavin: Socialism in the Bolshevik movement a little more than the most vehement opponents of socialism reject it on the basis of the produced unsuccessfully in Russian experiment. Communist ideology lies in the surface layer of the Russian historical process. Its purpose and the impact should not be exaggerated. To fight with labels and scares them do order? 3) the methodology of science, which was first deployed in these philosophical trends and again unsubstantiated claims. Once I have already said, it is cheating to record someones particular account of the methods of science in general methodology without a se rious justification. By the way, among the physicists no reference to the so-called methodology does not pass all this is the last thing quackery and may face stuff. Landau, called Leontovich such Trepachev, specifically Prigogine, and even though thats wrong with the authorities, as a matter of fact. My example with Newton is very revealing: Science separately, but that is not her most direct relationship, for example, religion, etc. beliefs separately. way of thinking, that is, what is the actual philosophy, which could play a role, in fact, was and still is, a purely natural, not a conscious process. Hence, the crisis in the sciences. So do not cheat and unsubstantiated to say that here, they say, such a specifically learned this and that and so become a receiver. It happens, but it is a rarity, which is necessary to understand. But here is one example, Marxist participate in experiments and their theoretical formulation is well known: it is the successful education of a w hole group of deaf-blind children in a boarding school: Dr. IA Sokolyansky, AI Meshcheryakov, philosopher EV Ilyenkov. As far as I know, the analogues were no more! Apart from isolated cases the priests did not work! But the fact that substantially all of the natural scientists, when its really busy with their work and not reasoning natural materialists and natural Gnostics, but otherwise you can not understand it. Master the necessary method of thinking consciously it is just a problem of the future. 4) For CHA religion and philosophy are one and the same well, no, again slander. Do I have to start here prosvetitelstvovat? Kindly (kratenko): The subject of philosophy as a science is the truth. Truth (definition) by tradition from Aristotle through Hegel and Marx is the satisfaction of our perceptions of reality, reality itself. Philosophy, moreover, the most common way of thinking philosophy, providing a very common method of knowledge, inevitably is the most common method of thinking to create a common way of thinking, it is impossible not to study the process of thinking. Therefore, philosophy is the science of thinking. Thinking is the subject of a number of studies sciences, in particular psychology. The difference is, that philosophy it explores how the process leading to the truth, the truth of comprehension of the process. It is the logic of 5) How many times have been called the great philosophers bastard -. That it proves or cancel? Why it is generally discussed here? The argument is that? They say, and they hang Negroes? What a bore! Come by yourself and tease add: in one book, the authors considered the number of times Lenin used the word shit (40), for example, remember about Soviet apparatus shit, according to Lenin. It is true, it most, recent studies have confirmed 1922 solid Stalinist appointees and in large numbers. Yes, man is not led by the nose himself or others. But a brilliant politician near certain to deliver. What diffe rence does it make use of their invectives? The port of they say, theres some uncouth lout still persists. And against the philosophers he vosche brought the case to the absurd philosophy of dividing into two parties. Why? Because of the need to follow the only possible strategy: to maintain the ideology of the party, to avoid confusion and death in this muti many underdeveloped distortions, and he was right as a politician: there was no time to philosophize, it was necessary to deal with the case. 6) It is this ideologem deny any morality other than the so-called proletarian and led to the fact that the life of people do not even penny can not be a person does not understand or explain without ideological labels. Cyril, you large cheated, all of your common sense caught up in trivia. Once again, not slogans driven by the masses, but something else more tangible. Say that again? Material interests. Slogans just make out the necessary ideological illusions, like liberty, equali ty, fraternity or there is socialism a paradise on earth. Here is your point of view in its purest form: the story is the movement of the column cohesive people to do the will of good leaders ie voluntarism (this includes the monarchy, constitutional monarchy, and Stalinism and Nazism, by the way, etc., etc. 7) and mannerisms are the same 🙂 just that, immediately insults and demagoguery 🙂 what do we keep? laugh, just laugh and bring them to the White Cullen and see how they lose their and before the awkward balance 🙂 - Cyril is you seem hysterical from complete misunderstanding in view of the prospects. What to do Review Essay Example What to do? Review Paper Essay on What to do? Cyril, as you answer again, not for the sake of the cereal, you then go on to preach, the more I do not plan to convince you, because I know enough about your so-ck be reference group. 1) Charges tsarist regime was not conventional wisdom, and the very fact that they are from the books this is your naivety that you have nothing to prove when directly indicate the source (as opposed to your method of blind citation that opponent must somehow take as a revelation). 2) the height of cynicism, demonstrate just you trying to prove quantitatively that the tsarist regime is supposedly a mere trifle compared with Stalinism. But if we call a spade a spade, it is no excuse for any of Stalinism nor the Stalinists anywhere you I did not find, for the reason that Im just one of those for whom these things are not just deeply hated, as I hope, for you, but, in addition, more and must be full disclosure and the most profound understanding of their causes, stages of development and their current st atus, and all the threats to the future coming from them and all of their similarities, that is, from the point of view as close to professional historical knowledge: I am the truth about you n orasskazhu such that the worst of all lies But it is here that the mandatory requirements of scientific methodology to distinguish For example, Bolshevism and Stalinism: the first completely disappeared from the scene just at a time when there was and stronger second: physically disappeared those new people who made the revolution, and the other in the history of this time was not. The remnants of what was called the Leninist Guard the new people was first destroyed by Stalinism: Soon the days will begin to seethe in a mysterious fit of rage. And they went to the Communists on the chopping block, the lies and shame. Without distinction of shades: the central and the right-wing and left them all waiting for one to come a slander and an ax (N. Korzhavin Tanya.) 3) For you as Bolshevism and Stalinism synonyms, and this, as is well known (see, for example.. here), pure ideological lie: but it is so say: 1) Stalinist ideology with the plus sign, 2) Western theories of the so-called totalitarianism with a minus sign. Similarly, these ideokumushki funny converge on the question of at what point there was Stalinism: in the 17 th and this is again a lie, and then, as they say, everywhere But the most profound interpreters of history simplify the process of understanding the history to complete absurd: everything is simple devils, they say came from abroad in a sealed train and began to incite the people to a great revolution, and even for German money, and here you are you work! And inflated respectable audience at all times. I did a review here about Karsavina of the many quotes. So there is a pro-historian, literally scoffed at such devilry in the understanding of the historical process. Esteem not a textbook look to use, and there is also still a point of view of different historians and not from books. 4) VS Kurochkin do not like? And for me at the time. How is it, about the great truths: Everywhere came glasnost, circle progress, and meanwhile Blessed is he who says little and who does not think at all. Odinozhdy one one, this way and that Rakhmetova = devils shot each other in Stalins torture chambers a complete and utter nonsense. 5) We know more and the post-war generation of new people Chernyshevsky, exactly as the People at the time honestly tried to push back against despotism Stalinism. A number of youth organizations (about a dozen most famous Voronezh OPM -.. The Communist Party youth about their story Zhigulina A. Black Stones of others, see here) was milled in the late 40s and early 50s. All of them were under the theoretical banner of Lenin against Stalin. And this is really a deadly truth about the same new people that appear when under the yoke of despotism becomes unbearable to live. And then are like you, they are r eady Strum, drive, curse, equated with demons, etc. That is cynicism. Ignorance is not an excuse, as you know. 6) Now for the science, by the way, I must warn on Sun. . Cl, I have a direct relationship a physicist. I must still warn that a further development of science, neo-positivism, and so on. Does not have and can not have any, at least, of a direct relationship, about which you write. Its like that say something like this: as Newton was deeply religious, it means that the opening of the laws of mechanics, the Christian faith has a direct relationship hurray Orthodoxy! All of the brilliant scientists could be anyone Machians, neopositivists, neo-Kantians, marksitsami including (for example, Landau considered himself a Marxist whole life to 14 years), but to prove the effect of this or that philosophical concept on the development of the science of logic type At the same time, then due to the fact - its just a scam or a slaver with a fair amount of ideological seasoning. But such studies are devoted to the life, to reliably find out how and where it is, and that he took on the case. And this is their real contribution to the theory of knowledge or epistemology, as they say now. For example, there is a book by L. Graham not the most outstanding research, but written entirely in good faith by Western researchers a review of the impact had ideological doctrines scoop on the development of Soviet and world science. On the contrary, a remarkable galaxy of Soviet physicists always had to actively resist the most brutal pressure from the authorities, forcing them to accept a huge impact dialectical materialism and historical materialism wretched scoop on current knowledge. There are excellent research A. Senin on this topic: Philosophical idealism or one of the ideological campaign. And you, Cyril, insist, in principle, the same misery, but on the other ideoplatformy neo. Generally strange to hear that the neo-something it brings to the science that Huss erl etc. All this public consistently and actively proves the impossibility of the essential (ie, theoretical) knowledge ( The Crisis of European Sciences ), the impossibility of knowing the motion, because any kind of neo (which, by the way, three basic) necessarily includes agnosticism. Sorry, but such is the real obscurantism, but only theoretical, so not so noticeable. Its methodology to distinguish! is needed here. 7) Now once again about the manifestations of violence in history. And here I say the same: to distinguish! Its one thing when there is armed struggle white bone is planning a raid on the south of Russia under the slogan take no prisoners and the Bolsheviks in the same days more play in the Constituent Assembly to dissolve not to dissolve but it is good that almost yourself and fled but history likes to repeat itself: the same delegates Kolchak ofitsero perekololo bayonets on the bank of the Irtysh is somewhat different from the Bolshevik version, is not it? Ex ecutions of armed enemies this is one story, but civilians terror quite different, just been doing Kolchak in Siberia, so much so that he hated all the parties, and the Bolsheviks even to his execution is not ripe, well-known, I hope the story? Or Admiral outweighed all? And so it operates a modern ideology a holy place is never empty! That is cynicism the ability to meaningful lies. 8) Now, regarding the influence of literature, about which you write. You are a prisoner of the usual illusions that, say, art, and literature in particular, are capable of something someone open, explain, prove, etc. Unfortunately, not only in my opinion, she has it, there can be the necessary means to have science, which by the way, has an excellent understanding of Pushkin shortly before his death. It is understood and wrote about the same VT Shalamov (again): Art is deprived rights to preach. The misfortune of the Russian literature in that it climbs own business, break peoples lives, speaking o ut on matters in which she does not understand, these maxims hear polemic with Solzhenitsyn, who enter into an open struggle with the regime , relying on the Russian conservative tradition (Dostoevsky), and moral example of Leo Tolstoy. In a letter in 1972 Shalamov wrote bluntly: Solzhenitsyn entire literary motives classics of the second half of the 19th century, all who follow Tolstoys precepts liars, these teachers, poets, prophets, fiction writers can bring only harm. On belief Shalamov, may return any hell, alas! His grim prediction of it based on the fact that it is not grasped the main lesson of the 20th century in Russia lesson exposure of the animal at the beginning of most humanist concept. What to do Review Essay Example What to do? Review Paper Essay on What to do? Not only I, but some words still in the review about it can be found. At the very beginning of the novel Chernyshevsky clearly sets out its claim to literary component they say, the case, in this case, is not it, I have no shadow of artistic talent. I even know the language of something bad. But this is still nothing: read, kind audience! Prochtosh not without benefit. Truth a good thing: it rewards the shortcomings of the writer, who serves it. Therefore I tell you, if I did not warn you, you probably would have thought that the story was written artistically, that the author of a lot of poetic talent. But I warned you that the talent I have, and you will know now that all the advantages of the novel is given to her only her the truth. whether to accept it as the authors deceit, which just slightly covered pen test? Yes and no. Yes, because the writers talent here really was not the main means of implementation of the plan, that is, apparently, it was hard subordinate tasks very different sort unprecedented in the literature. And then make a statement and all had to conform to it, on the one hand, and on the other to focus the readers attention on the ideological side, which requires reading a very different quality. And no, because there Chernyshevsky, for example, Prologue (although written later), where downright thrilling excitement of the first 50-60 pages can not be subjected to any doubt, but then everything changes dramatically, sentimental romance is simply ridiculous cover Chernyshevsky new serious conversation with your readers. Therefore, all who are looking for affordable reading light, a little derive for itself and clearly not for them, and it was written and the circumstances of time and place. What to do Review Essay Example What to do? Review Paper Essay on What to do? In 1862 NG Chernyshevsky was arrested for and to prove the involvement to writing proclamations Barsky peasants from their bow-wishers and imprisoned in the fortress. Here it was written the novel What to do? ». As one of the most profound and original Russian thinkers Chernyshevsky almost immediately was registered in Europe. And it is not someone else, and Marx, and not just seen. It is well known that one of the main reasons that Marx began to study Russian language, there was a need to read the works of the great pre-Marxian socialist period (Lenin) in the original. Why? And because, despite numerous state of the art lies and slander Chernyshevsky almost the only thinker who in his time was able to come close to the most advanced ideological frontiers of contemporary Europe: the idea of ​​historical materialism to the understanding of a single historical process and its laws. And he managed to make return to the main conclusions. A number of these ideas can be found in the novel. Thats why, another very famous Russian spoke about the novel literally as follows: It is useless to read if wet behind the ears. Chernyshevsky is too complicated, full of thoughts, to understand it and evaluate at an early age , and the main conclusion of the reading: Every right-thinking and really decent person must be a revolutionary (Lenin) its not just that Chernyshevsky perfectly knew the history of contemporary Europe and wrote excellent analytical essays on the history of the same France ( Cavaignac, France under Louis-Napoleon). And not the fact that he was able at that time already discarded rubbish pathetic neo-Kantians, positivists, Machians and other muddled (Lenin). Not even in the fact that here play a decisive role, and on the other, a very acute problem of enormous power of evil in front of us a scientist, independently put forward the idea of ​​universal history, where on the one hand, the material conditions of life of the people in the . history as the negative qualities of the people making the story We will write a custom essay sample on What to do? Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on What to do? Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on What to do? Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer there is no doubt that Chernyshevsky perfectly understood the main thing: to avoid revolutionary Russia can not be an explosion, so it is necessary to prepare for it that is, in theory to prepare a generation of new people - the true elite of his Vreme no. Their appearance the same inevitable process of natural history. That is why the line of the novel is not agitation, although the author of the aesthetic theory could not give a fascinating paintings of the ideal of human relationships, but even the authors style does not define any entertaining or enticing. And, of course, the novel not a prophecy, and according to the rigorous derivation of the analyst, together with a detailed knowledge and understanding of what exactly such NEW PEOPLE necessarily and it is this they are waiting for the fate of:  «The newly born this type and quickly rasplozhaetsya. He is born of time, it is sign of the times, and we say it will disappear along with their time, a short time. His recent life doomed to be short life. Six years ago, these people have not seen; Three years ago, I despised; now but still, what they think about them is now; in a few years, very few years, they will cry out: Save us!, and that they will say, will be implemented by all; even a few years, perhaps, and not years and months, and will condemn them, and they will be driven from the scene, oshikannye, stramimye. So, Strum and chic, chase and curse, you get benefit from them, that for them are pretty, and a noise of boos, under the thunder of curses, they descend from the stage proud and humble, tough and good as they were. And they will not go on stage? No. How could be without them? Poorly. But after them, all the same will be better than before them. And will take years, and people will say: After they got better ; but still it left a bad thing. And when they say it, its time to revive this type, and it is reborn in a more numerous people in the best shape, because then all the good will be more, and all good things will be better; and again the same story in a new way. And so it goes as long as people say, Well, now we are fine, then it will not be of a particular type, because all people are of this type, and with difficulty will understand how it was a time when it was considered special type, not obscheyu in kind of all people?  » What to do Review Essay Example What to do? Review Paper Essay on What to do? 1. I think you should be clear for a long time and without any sources, that is, of course, not only I, but also any normal agrees that the number of victims and massacres on either side and in the civil, and especially in the period of Stalinism It exceeds the bloody experience of autocracy. But again, statistics on its own in the history does not prove anything, and do not explain it as about three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics. 2. And where is isms? and despite the fact that only isms and can obtain a systematic understanding of the essence of what is happening, that is, scientific knowledge, because around them so many illusions and distortions, can not be helped, everyone tries to settle down to a science by banner, Especially Tolokonov foreheads recently pushing. the new people of another persons life for the sake of the great cause in the penny did not put and again I say, when talking about the armed = class struggle, then, sorry, fl special items, and t herefore willing to subscribe to all the firing notes Lenin, and even those that are against the kulaks, where hang, hang without fail and find people potvorzhe in war as in war the dictatorship in the bag can not hide. And the priests more reactionary duhoventsva the better about hunger and requisition of church valuables to the needs of the hungry signatures !!! Or need to tediously explain who the reactionary clergy? Thats right! The only way to manage the gentry-bloodsuckers, until we wail about the principles of social justice, and only then well talk. A current that is waiting to say? Duracho after crawling out of all the forces on the same rake. Forgot? Forgotten that history is an objective process, it is like Newtons laws, the path up to the initial conditions. And nothing about the new people the usual slander, was right Chernyshevski historian, before whose eyes were the European experience, France. 3. Do not convincingly Bring tsitatku, prove that this is the s pecificity of positivism in accordance with the definition (above what is also necessary to work), but otherwise antlers, laziness and the verbiage, you and I and more simply say that, they say, is inevitable crossing them like odinozhdy-one platitudes and shoulders shake and here I am? Yes, unfortunately, many physicists, solely because of inexperience and ignorance, under the influence of ideological mechanisms (holy place is not empty) are and positivists and neo-Kantians, but not all, but once taken for their all like a hand: the research element all put into place. It happens, and vice versa, when a physicist somehow climb is not his own, no one does not trust, but with its rationalism and skills researcher to see everything as it is in fact and not as chanting in his ear t. n. humanities and suddenly rediscovered and dialectics, and its own informal logic, calling, however, their own way. But then, as the saying goes, even though a pot name . You want to take a look at thi s? Read EL Feinberg. Two cultures (somewhere in my library I want to read everything). Ilyenkov most of my favorite authors in the 80s, perfectly solved the problems of a Marxist of his time, so can not work here about him raspaltsovkoy indecent, ladies can see 4. The subject of philosophy has always been not the truth Aristotle, therefore, Hegel, Marx, and many others. Other major wrong? Congratulations on the opening ship barrels. Youre talking about philosophy, worldview, and its something about the science-philosophy. Ridiculed Semenov laughter without cause sign and where the public is now and who knows about them And Semenov book has more than 20 languages. For example, in the West they write that this is one of the most erudite anthropologist, a brilliant theorist who has the gift of the compressed presentation of the most complex ideas, erudite to keep abreast of the new-fangled trends in the West, etc. etc. provide a link? It is clear that this independence is ou r humanitarian bastard will not forgive and in this comparison, no they are not the humanities, but rather ciliates So, and about Semenova better not slander (and do not expect even that is something here I do not know in detail ). As the announcement of: preparing a series of reissues Semenov the fact that the most prestigious publishing houses now offer literally a race to the author the most favorable terms of publications. A more recently completed a lot of work (reportedly more than 700 pages) of the theory of knowledge I recommend not to miss! As always its almost like the Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Philosophy of History. 5. About what Lenin was a great . Ready reviews of his contemporaries recall: Esenina (. Walk see box) or Bryusova you know, here it is: the Earth! green Planet! Worthless ball in the family of planets! Your greatness name it, Between the glory of Thy no more beautiful! Join now! 6. nobody goes columns, each looking for its particular happiness wh at a naivety and slander of the scoop, one to the other never stopped, ask to the authorities if you do not believe me. Yes rational egoism of Chernyshevsky should not forget .. 7. Its time to wrap it, and the lady is already looking towards disapproving and in many respects they are right, especially about the erudition mnogoznanie mind does not teach and no one but amateurs , in no way to talk sense, but I do recall, and not planned.